Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753869AbbDHDWy (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Apr 2015 23:22:54 -0400 Received: from imap.thunk.org ([74.207.234.97]:55763 "EHLO imap.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751994AbbDHDWv (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Apr 2015 23:22:51 -0400 Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2015 23:22:27 -0400 From: "Theodore Ts'o" To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Richard Weinberger , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Ingo Molnar , Joe Perches , LKML , Ingo Molnar , Linus Torvalds , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: about the flood of trivial patches and the Code of Conduct (was: Re: [PATCH 19/25] sched: Use bool function return values of true/false not 1/0) Message-ID: <20150408032227.GD21171@thunk.org> Mail-Followup-To: Theodore Ts'o , Peter Zijlstra , Richard Weinberger , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Ingo Molnar , Joe Perches , LKML , Ingo Molnar , Linus Torvalds , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" References: <93bd3fb8db14c75508f7169840824539a3f89606.1427759010.git.joe@perches.com> <20150331085320.GR27490@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20150331090349.GA16604@gmail.com> <1427820400.10376.23.camel@perches.com> <20150407091246.GA9673@gmail.com> <20150407110049.GA11218@kroah.com> <20150407113212.GM21418@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150407113212.GM21418@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: tytso@thunk.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on imap.thunk.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1008 Lines: 24 On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 01:32:12PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > I propose to send all this stuff though the trivial tree such that maintainers > > of other subsystems have less workload and newbies (which are supposed > > to send such patches) know which tree they have to work against. > > Let's have to well defined and ordered. :-) > > As per the other branch of this tree; an emphatic NO to that. The > trivial tree is not a backdoor to bypass maintainers. Actual code > changes do not get to go through any tree but the maintainer tree unless > explicitly ACKed. Agreed, I don't want trivial patches to ext4 either (a) polluting my inbox, or (b) sneaking in behind my back in the trivial tree. Joe, please just stop the madness. Thanks, - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/