Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 13:17:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 13:17:20 -0500 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:10917 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 13:17:19 -0500 Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 19:25:49 +0100 From: Jens Axboe To: Alan Cox Cc: Andre Hedrick , fverscheure@wanadoo.fr, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Marcelo Tosatti Subject: Re: Problem in IDE Disks cache handling in kernel 2.4.XX Message-ID: <20030110182549.GN843@suse.de> References: <1042207998.28469.98.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> <20030110164834.GM843@suse.de> <1042222339.32175.3.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1042222339.32175.3.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 912 Lines: 25 On Fri, Jan 10 2003, Alan Cox wrote: > On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 16:48, Jens Axboe wrote: > > In the barrier patches, I just used drive->quiet to supress ide_error() > > complaining too much (on cache flushes, too). Whether that's per-drive > > of per-hwif entity, dunno... > > Commands are queued per hwif so it doesn't actually matter I suspect. True > BTW do you plan to fix up the oopses in the tcq code or should I just mark > it disabled for anyone who has the time to finish the job ? There are a > whole pile of drivers that fail with tcq - mostly because they have custom > dma end functions Yes I will get around to it, probably next week. -- Jens Axboe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/