Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2015 16:43:04 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Luca Abeni <lucabe72@gmail.com>
Cc: henrik@austad.us, juri.lelli@gmail.com, raistlin@linux.it,
        mingo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it>
Subject: Re: [RFC 4/4] Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt: add some
 references
Message-ID: <20150408144304.GH5029@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <1428494380-1917-1-git-send-email-luca.abeni@unitn.it>
 <1428494380-1917-5-git-send-email-luca.abeni@unitn.it>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1428494380-1917-5-git-send-email-luca.abeni@unitn.it>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1095
Lines: 19

On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 01:59:40PM +0200, Luca Abeni wrote:
> + As seen, enforcing that the total utilisation is smaller than M does not
> + guarantee that global EDF schedules the tasks without missing any deadline
> + (in other words, global EDF is not an optimal scheduling algorithm). However,
> + a total utilisation smaller than M is enough to guarantee that non real-time
> + tasks are not starved and that the tardiness of real-time tasks has an upper
> + bound[12] (as previously noticed). Different bounds on the maximum tardiness

                             ^^^ noted?

> + experienced by real-time tasks have been developed in various papers[13,14],
> + but the theoretical result that is important for SCHED_DEADLINE is that if
> + the total utilisation is smaller or equal than M then the response times of
> + the tasks are limited.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/