Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S266998AbTAJT1Q>; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 14:27:16 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S267022AbTAJT1Q>; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 14:27:16 -0500
Received: from cambot.suite224.net ([209.176.64.2]:29704 "EHLO suite224.net")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S266998AbTAJT1P>;
	Fri, 10 Jan 2003 14:27:15 -0500
Message-ID: <001801c2b8df$ada6c200$0100a8c0@PCS686>
From: "Matthew D. Pitts" <mpitts@suite224.net>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0301100921460.12833-100000@home.transmeta.com> <20030110184739.GA1579@werewolf.able.es>
Subject: Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 14:37:13 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 546
Lines: 19


> > They should probably be marked deprecated, and if they don't get a lot
of
> > maintenance, that's fine.
> >
> > Linus
>
> As there is a CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL, how about a CONFIG_DEPRECATED for the
> opposite edge ?
>
I heartly second this. And would be willing to do it when time permits.

Matthew

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/