Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755881AbbDIOvn (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Apr 2015 10:51:43 -0400 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:12371 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755860AbbDIOvh (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Apr 2015 10:51:37 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,550,1422950400"; d="scan'208";a="553593931" User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.8.150116 Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2015 22:44:11 -0700 Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] selftest: Add futex functional tests From: Darren Hart To: Shuah Khan , Darren Hart CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List , , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner , Davidlohr Bueso , KOSAKI Motohiro , greg Kroah-Hartman , , Michael Ellerman Message-ID: Thread-Topic: [GIT PULL] selftest: Add futex functional tests References: <551ABE00.9050003@osg.samsung.com> <551ACD5F.8010003@osg.samsung.com> <20150408041257.GC14618@fury.dvhart.com> <55261120.7040902@osg.samsung.com> In-Reply-To: <55261120.7040902@osg.samsung.com> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2452 Lines: 82 On 4/8/15, 10:41 PM, "Shuah Khan" wrote: >On 04/07/2015 10:12 PM, Darren Hart wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 10:37:51AM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote: >>> On 03/31/2015 10:24 AM, Darren Hart wrote: >>>> On 3/31/15, 8:32 AM, "Shuah Khan" wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Daren, >>>>> >>>>> On 03/27/2015 04:17 PM, Darren Hart wrote: >>>>>> Hi Shuah, >>>>>> >>>>>> This series begins the process of migrating my futextest tests into >>>>>> kselftest. >>>>>> I've started with only the functional tests, as the performance and >>>>>> stress may >>>>>> not be appropriate for kselftest as they stand. >>>>>> >>>>>> I cleaned up various complaints from checkpatch, but I ignored >>>>>>others >>>>>> that would >>>>>> require significant rework of the testcases, such as not using >>>>>>volatile >>>>>> and not >>>>>> creating new typedefs. >>>>>> >>>>>> The patches will follow, but I'm providing a pull request for your >>>>>> convenience >>>>>> as well. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for acting on this so quickly after we talked about it at ELC. >>>>> Just a quick note that I am going to get to this soon once I get the >>>>> 4.1 content wrapped up. We can plan upon getting these into 4.2. >>>> >>>> OK. Michael E. provided some feedback which I can either incorporate >>>>and >>>> respin, or I can send as a follow-on to your -next after you merge >>>>these. >>>> Which do you prefer? >>>> >> >> ... >> >>> You can wait to re-do patches. I am planning to review the >>> patch set later on this week. That way you can avoid re-spin >>> just in case, I have other comments. >> >> Hi Shuah, >> >> Did you have any additional comments for the futex tests? >> >> Thanks, >> > > >Sorry Daren. I got called away on a family emergency. The patch >looks good to me and I don't have any additional comments. No problem, hope things are alright. > >Assume these get pulled in for 4.2 release. I will get to them >soon once the 4.1-rc1 is out. You had some initial comments, do you want me to tend to those and resend, or will you pull as is and have me follow-up - either is fine, just let me know what you prefer. Thanks, -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/