Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755318AbbDIJR6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Apr 2015 05:17:58 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:34181 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932737AbbDIJRu (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Apr 2015 05:17:50 -0400 Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 11:17:33 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Luca Abeni Cc: Luca Abeni , henrik@austad.us, juri.lelli@gmail.com, raistlin@linux.it, mingo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC 0/4] SCHED_DEADLINE documentation update Message-ID: <20150409091733.GO5029@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1428494380-1917-1-git-send-email-luca.abeni@unitn.it> <20150408144421.GI5029@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <552642A6.7040501@unitn.it> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <552642A6.7040501@unitn.it> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 714 Lines: 13 On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 11:13:10AM +0200, Luca Abeni wrote: > Ok; so how should I proceed? Should I address the various comments (by you, Juri > and Henrik) by sending incremental patches based on these ones (since I see you queued > these patches), or should I resend everything after addressing the various comments? Whichever you prefer, if you'd like to just respin these patches that's fine, I'll drop them -- but let me know before they end up in a git tree ;-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/