Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 20:25:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 20:25:06 -0500 Received: from havoc.daloft.com ([64.213.145.173]:37078 "EHLO havoc.gtf.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 20:25:05 -0500 Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 20:33:46 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik To: jjs Cc: Marc-Christian Petersen , Bill Abt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: NGPT 2.2.0 RELEASED: TOPS LINUXTHREADS AND NPTL IN SCALABILITY AND PERFORMANCE Message-ID: <20030111013346.GB25649@gtf.org> References: <200301110203.09346.m.c.p@gmx.net> <3E1F72D7.7050505@lexus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3E1F72D7.7050505@lexus.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 558 Lines: 15 On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 05:26:47PM -0800, jjs wrote: > But according to my understanding, a more accurate > measure of nptl performance would require a current > glibc, with the nptl-specific enhancements - > > or am I missing something here? You are correct: you need a recent 2.5 kernel and a recent glibc. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/