Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 20:35:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 20:35:45 -0500 Received: from havoc.daloft.com ([64.213.145.173]:38870 "EHLO havoc.gtf.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 20:35:44 -0500 Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 20:44:25 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: NGPT 2.2.0 RELEASED: TOPS LINUXTHREADS AND NPTL IN SCALABILITY AND PERFORMANCE Message-ID: <20030111014425.GC25649@gtf.org> References: <200301110203.09346.m.c.p@gmx.net> <3E1F72D7.7050505@lexus.com> <20030111013346.GB25649@gtf.org> <200301110141.h0B1f9LK017119@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200301110141.h0B1f9LK017119@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 824 Lines: 23 On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 08:41:09PM -0500, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote: > On Fri, 10 Jan 2003 20:33:46 EST, Jeff Garzik said: > > You are correct: you need a recent 2.5 kernel and a recent glibc. > I'll bite - how recent a glibc? Does the 2.3.1 RPM that RedHat included > on the Phoebe beta qualify, or do we need even more bleeding-edge? AFAIK, yes, it was included in the Phoebe beta. However, I also pretty sure that fixes have been made since then, so I would grab the latest glibc from cvs... This is unfortunately a better question for the glibc lists ;-) Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/