Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 08:23:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 08:23:09 -0500 Received: from viper.haque.net ([64.0.249.226]:2690 "EHLO viper.haque.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 08:22:54 -0500 Message-ID: <3A893509.89E79DA4@haque.net> Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 08:22:17 -0500 From: "Mohammad A. Haque" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2-pre3 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alan Cox CC: "Mike A. Harris" , Mike Harrold , David Woodhouse , Guest section DW , Matti Aarnio , Guennadi Liakhovetski , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: lkml subject line In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Some people keep telling me that the way mutt handles headers is 'broken'. I've looked at it myself and don't see anything wrong and no one explains their accusations. Anyone know anything about this or are they blowing hot air? Alan Cox wrote: > > I've played with both pine and mutt. mutt is by the better mail system IMHO, > but pine has an easier learning curve. -- ===================================================================== Mohammad A. Haque http://www.haque.net/ mhaque@haque.net "Alcohol and calculus don't mix. Project Lead Don't drink and derive." --Unknown http://wm.themes.org/ batmanppc@themes.org ===================================================================== - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/