Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932789AbbDIRTK (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Apr 2015 13:19:10 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-f41.google.com ([74.125.82.41]:35735 "EHLO mail-wg0-f41.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754043AbbDIRTF (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Apr 2015 13:19:05 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20150409093130.GC883@kroah.com> References: <1428536161-2978-1-git-send-email-mjg59@coreos.com> <20150409093130.GC883@kroah.com> Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 10:19:04 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] usb: Prefer firmware values when determining whether a port is removable From: Matthew Garrett To: Greg KH Cc: Matthew Garrett , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 975 Lines: 22 On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 2:31 AM, Greg KH wrote: > Anyway, is this all a Windows 8 requirement? If so, I'll feel > comfortable making these changes, otherwise we are at the mercy of the > bios people to randomly get things right, and we all know how often that > works... It's covered by System.Fundamentals.SystemUSB.XHCIControllersMustHaveEmbeddedInfo - I guess there's an argument for having the order depend on the controller, but I suspect that anything with _PLD and _UPC objects will be fine. The alternative means we're just relying on a different set of firmware information (ie, did the hardware vendor bother setting the hub flags), so... -- Matthew Garrett | matthew.garrett@coreos.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/