Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 22:58:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 22:58:08 -0500 Received: from mta5.srv.hcvlny.cv.net ([167.206.5.31]:13010 "EHLO mta5.srv.hcvlny.cv.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 22:58:06 -0500 Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 23:05:29 -0500 From: Rob Wilkens Subject: Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently" In-reply-to: <20030110205203.A30604@hq.fsmlabs.com> To: yodaiken@fsmlabs.com Cc: Larry McVoy , Alan Cox , Larry Sendlosky , Richard Stallman , Linux Kernel Mailing List Reply-to: robw@optonline.net Message-id: <1042257928.1278.147.camel@RobsPC.RobertWilkens.com> Organization: Robert Wilkens MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.1 Content-type: text/plain Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <7BFCE5F1EF28D64198522688F5449D5A03C0F4@xchangeserver2.storigen.com> <1042250324.1278.18.camel@RobsPC.RobertWilkens.com> <20030111020738.GC9373@work.bitmover.com> <1042255571.32431.43.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> <20030111025449.GJ9124@work.bitmover.com> <1042253924.1385.70.camel@RobsPC.RobertWilkens.com> <20030110205203.A30604@hq.fsmlabs.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2016 Lines: 39 On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 22:52, yodaiken@fsmlabs.com wrote: > "fortune". Nearly anyone can pick this up. Val Henson's mom even Writing fortune is probably far more complicated than writing the kernel. By that, of course, I mean writing the individual fortunes which fortune spits out It's also more useful. The kernel, by itself, does nothing. It's like saying "the cpu is the most important part of the computer". Yeah, but without the a bios, what can you do with it? (Actually, a lot, if you can bootstrap the OS by other means, but you need hardware engineers to help you with that, and I've done it.) An OS is just another layer in the onion.. What's nice is that in an ideal world, that software follows standards.. Linux is still trying to find it's way in that respect it seems (for example, today I found that my 2.4 oss sound driver no longer works just right in the 2.5 kernel nor is it likely to be supported in the future since some SuSE specific sound system is replacing it -- I guess SuSE gave Torvalds some stock options or similar.) Also, the once perfectly functioning nvidia kernel driver (the subject of this message) no longer works in newer kernels -- whereas if there were a standard interface for such things, nvidia could freely keep their source closed while providing a driver that would solve people's problems. At least windows a few years back standardized on the wdm (windows driver model) whereby there was a standard interface for what a driver looked like and what it's interface to the kernel was (whether the platform was the dos-based windows 9x or NT-based Windows 2000/XP). This is not to say that I'm "trolling" by extolling the virtues of windows over linux.. I'm just pointing out what I know in this area. -Rob - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/