Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 11 Jan 2003 08:34:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 11 Jan 2003 08:34:26 -0500 Received: from pc2-cwma1-4-cust86.swan.cable.ntl.com ([213.105.254.86]:19348 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 11 Jan 2003 08:34:25 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH]Re: spin_locks without smp. From: Alan Cox To: Mikael Pettersson Cc: manfred@colorfullife.com, Linux Kernel Mailing List , solt@dns.toxicfilms.tv, wli@holomorphy.com In-Reply-To: <200301111322.OAA26316@harpo.it.uu.se> References: <200301111322.OAA26316@harpo.it.uu.se> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Message-Id: <1042295370.2517.0.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.1 (1.2.1-2) Date: 11 Jan 2003 14:29:32 +0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 848 Lines: 24 On Sat, 2003-01-11 at 13:22, Mikael Pettersson wrote: > On 10 Jan 2003 18:18:39 +0000, Alan Cox wrote: > >On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 17:19, Manfred Spraul wrote: > >> > >> disable_irq(); > >> spin_lock(&np->lock); > >> > >> That's what 8390.c uses, no need for an #ifdef. > > > >Does someone have a card they can test that on. If so then I agree > >entirely it is the best way to go > > I have an ISA NE2000 available for testing, if someone feeds me patches. > Only UP hardware, though. Sorry I wasnt clear enough. The 8390 is done, the one that would need the testing is SMP etherexpress.c. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/