Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753864AbbDMJo4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Apr 2015 05:44:56 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:60199 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753367AbbDMJoz (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Apr 2015 05:44:55 -0400 Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 11:44:52 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Daniel Baluta Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, hch@lst.de, jlbec@evilplan.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, lars@metafoo.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] configfs: init configfs module earlier at boot time Message-ID: <20150413094452.GB5259@lst.de> References: <1428422171-3180-1-git-send-email-daniel.baluta@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1428422171-3180-1-git-send-email-daniel.baluta@intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 713 Lines: 18 On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 06:56:11PM +0300, Daniel Baluta wrote: > We need this earlier in the boot process to allow various subsystems > to use configfs (e.g Industrial IIO). > > Also, debugfs is at core_initcall level and configfs should be on > the same level from infrastructure point of view. > > Suggested-by: Lars-Peter Clausen > Signed-off-by: Daniel Baluta Looks fine: Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/