Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1754325AbbDMSby (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 13 Apr 2015 14:31:54 -0400
Received: from mail-ie0-f172.google.com ([209.85.223.172]:36766 "EHLO
	mail-ie0-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751177AbbDMSbv (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 13 Apr 2015 14:31:51 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20150413172624.GC398@x4>
References: <20150410091252.GA27630@gmail.com>
	<20150410092152.GA21332@gmail.com>
	<20150410111427.GA30477@gmail.com>
	<20150410112748.GB30477@gmail.com>
	<20150410120846.GA17101@gmail.com>
	<5527C700.3030405@redhat.com>
	<5527CD92.1080901@zytor.com>
	<20150411144135.GB31416@x4>
	<20150412101422.GA2862@gmail.com>
	<20150413162308.GB398@x4>
	<20150413172624.GC398@x4>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 11:31:50 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: WEZHp5qYAhAdoYAt2yUivP2vHog
Message-ID: <CA+55aFyWonZVCwynECu1TgpraNnQ_K8YzHf9oPMUM3-St-QaPw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Align jump targets to 1 byte boundaries
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
        Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
        Aswin Chandramouleeswaran <aswin@hp.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 630
Lines: 17

On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Markus Trippelsdorf
<markus@trippelsdorf.de> wrote:
>
> I must have made a measurement mistake above, because the actual code
> size savings are roughly 5%:

Can you check against the -fno-guess-branch-probability output?

Does lto (without pgo) perhaps end up undoing a lot of the random
"branch out and back" noise?

                          Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/