Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 12 Jan 2003 02:56:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 12 Jan 2003 02:56:07 -0500 Received: from h80ad2641.async.vt.edu ([128.173.38.65]:58241 "EHLO turing-police.cc.vt.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 12 Jan 2003 02:56:06 -0500 Message-Id: <200301120804.h0C84jLE011563@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4+dev To: Mark Mielke Cc: David Schwartz , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: inefficient RT vs efficient non-RT In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 12 Jan 2003 02:58:44 EST." <20030112075844.GA16050@mark.mielke.cc> From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu References: <20030112075844.GA16050@mark.mielke.cc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_-500163364P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 03:04:44 -0500 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1383 Lines: 41 --==_Exmh_-500163364P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Sun, 12 Jan 2003 02:58:44 EST, Mark Mielke said: > Think about it logically -- if I can process 5X as much data as you can on > the same hardware, but I can't guarantee that *at* 5X no data will be lost, > but then, I only run at 1X (the same speed as you), how many packets have > a chance of being lost? The question is, of course, whether you're willing to bet the entire chemical plant on the chances of a packet being lost. There's a difference between "if the core temperature hits 350 degrees, the pump WILL go on in 13 milliseconds" and "if the core temp hits 350 degrees, the pump will have a 98% chance of going on sometime between 13 and 17.5 milliseconds..." -- Valdis Kletnieks Computer Systems Senior Engineer Virginia Tech --==_Exmh_-500163364P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iD8DBQE+ISGbcC3lWbTT17ARAvkZAKDbrKuP+OQOSp2avW1spLLBorI+RQCeJL4x sm6WLPJxaRcqdt0+VBwlugo= =Y4R/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_-500163364P-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/