Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753504AbbDNSC5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Apr 2015 14:02:57 -0400 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([134.134.136.65]:8449 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752500AbbDNSCu convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Apr 2015 14:02:50 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,577,1422950400"; d="scan'208";a="480842787" From: "Hefty, Sean" To: Jason Gunthorpe , "Weiny, Ira" CC: Michael Wang , Roland Dreier , Hal Rosenstock , "linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Tom Tucker , Steve Wise , Hoang-Nam Nguyen , Christoph Raisch , infinipath , Eli Cohen , "Latif, Faisal" , Jack Morgenstein , Or Gerlitz , Haggai Eran , Tom Talpey , Doug Ledford Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 07/28] IB/Verbs: Reform IB-ulp ipoib Thread-Topic: [PATCH v3 07/28] IB/Verbs: Reform IB-ulp ipoib Thread-Index: AQHQdeT2sFttzbzDr0mwYqlrDkZAnp1LyTCAgAAFUYCAAARbAIABMlqAgAA0SYCAAAUDgIAABHAA//+LcBA= Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 18:02:47 +0000 Message-ID: <1828884A29C6694DAF28B7E6B8A82373A8FC127C@ORSMSX109.amr.corp.intel.com> References: <552BB470.4090407@profitbricks.com> <552BB5AC.6050101@profitbricks.com> <20150413192701.GA19112@obsidianresearch.com> <20150413194602.GA21467@phlsvsds.ph.intel.com> <20150413200138.GC19112@obsidianresearch.com> <20150414141806.GA7354@phlsvsds.ph.intel.com> <20150414172514.GB7682@obsidianresearch.com> <20150414174311.GA28111@phlsvsds.ph.intel.com> <20150414175904.GB13896@obsidianresearch.com> In-Reply-To: <20150414175904.GB13896@obsidianresearch.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.22.254.139] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 620 Lines: 13 > Yes, that is the only reasonable thing that could happen. > > init failure should only be possible under exceptional cases (OOM). > > The only system response is to call ib_umad_add_one again - so of > course the first call had to completely clean up everything it did. A reasonable follow up change would be to replace the add device callbacks with add port callbacks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/