Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754116AbbDNTvk (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Apr 2015 15:51:40 -0400 Received: from mail-qk0-f173.google.com ([209.85.220.173]:35578 "EHLO mail-qk0-f173.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751761AbbDNTvb (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Apr 2015 15:51:31 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1428725871-4040-1-git-send-email-felipe.otamendi@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 15:51:07 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input: Fix multitouch support for Type Cover 3 From: Benjamin Tissoires To: Felipe Cc: Jiri Kosina , linux-input , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 9031 Lines: 195 On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Felipe wrote: > On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 11:16 AM Benjamin Tissoires > wrote: >> >> On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Felipe wrote: >> > Hi Benjamin, >> > >> > On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Benjamin Tissoires >> > wrote: >> >> Hi Felipe, >> >> >> >> On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 12:17 AM, Felipe Otamendi >> >> wrote: >> >>> Make the Type Cover 3 use the hid multitouch driver, which is better suited for the touchpad. Also, since it has multiple reports under the same interface, allow the generic hid driver to handle non-multitouch inputs such as the keyboard's. >> >> >> >> IIRC, the point of having hid-microsoft was to have better support of >> >> the keyboard special functions and shortcuts. Can you please confirm >> >> that you do not lose any functionality? >> >> >> > >> > I've checked and all the keys work as they used to with the previous >> > patch. The only thing that doesn't work is the led on the Caps Lock >> > key. That's because the output from the keyboard report is being >> > mapped as a different input than the input from the same report >> > because of how inputs are mapped when HID_QUIRK_MULTI_INPUT is >> > enabled. >> >> That is worrisome. It means that there will be a regression with the patch. >> If I understand correctly, with hid-microsoft, the Caps Lock LED >> works, and not with hid-multitouch? >> > > With hid-microsoft and hid-input the LED works, but not if you set the > HID_QUIRK_MULTI_INPUT. The hid-multitouch driver uses that quirk by > default but it is needed to get both the keyboard and touchpad as > different inputs so X11 drivers can pick them up independently. Also, > the hid-multitouch driver works well not only because it handles the > touchpad fields correctly but also because it initializes the device > in multitouch mode (Input mode feature report [1]) instead of mouse > mode. > The LED output report is mapped separately because of a combination of > how reports are traversed in hidinput_connect in hid-input.c and how > are mapped to new inputs with the HID_QUIRK_MULTI_INPUT. That part > seems dangerous to modify without breaking compatibility with other > devices. Maybe adding a different quirk? I don't know what the > protocol is in those cases. It took me a while but I finally got your point. hidinput_connect assigned two different input nodes for the input and output reports even if they share the same report ID. X believes there are 2 distinct keyboards and do not change the LED of the one without the LED declared :) This is definitively something we should fix in hid-input.c. IMO, the for loop in hidinput_configure() has been wild for too long and it is really hard to get what it does. I'll try to put something into it. > > [1] https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/hardware/dn467314%28v=vs.85%29.aspx > >> Can you share the report descriptors of the device? I might have had >> one, but I can not find it. >> > > Yes, here's the report [2], it is in html. > > [2] http://htmlpreview.github.io/?https://gist.githubusercontent.com/felipeota/2b7d9866ace154c38753/raw/d0d3e9b7a5876ba1f2cb93a80a3ba66e15d22294/TypeCover%203%20Descriptor > > Thanks. Replaying the report shows that there are a lot of input nodes created with an UNKNOWN name. This has to be cleaned up. I have quickly sketched a patch for that so you don't need to care about it right now. Cheers, Benjamin > >> > >> >>> >> >>> Signed-off-by: Felipe Otamendi >> >>> --- >> >>> drivers/hid/hid-core.c | 6 ++---- >> >>> drivers/hid/hid-microsoft.c | 3 --- >> >>> drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c | 5 +++++ >> >>> 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) >> >>> >> >>> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-core.c b/drivers/hid/hid-core.c >> >>> index 56ce8c2..5a80896 100644 >> >>> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-core.c >> >>> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-core.c >> >>> @@ -705,9 +705,8 @@ static void hid_scan_collection(struct hid_parser *parser, unsigned type) >> >>> hid->group = HID_GROUP_SENSOR_HUB; >> >>> >> >>> if (hid->vendor == USB_VENDOR_ID_MICROSOFT && >> >>> - (hid->product == USB_DEVICE_ID_MS_TYPE_COVER_3 || >> >>> - hid->product == USB_DEVICE_ID_MS_TYPE_COVER_3_JP) && >> >>> - hid->group == HID_GROUP_MULTITOUCH) >> >>> + hid->product == USB_DEVICE_ID_MS_TYPE_COVER_3_JP && >> >>> + hid->group == HID_GROUP_MULTITOUCH) >> >>> hid->group = HID_GROUP_GENERIC; >> >>> >> >>> if ((parser->global.usage_page << 16) == HID_UP_GENDESK) >> >>> @@ -1878,7 +1877,6 @@ static const struct hid_device_id hid_have_special_driver[] = { >> >>> { HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_MICROSOFT, USB_DEVICE_ID_MS_DIGITAL_MEDIA_3K) }, >> >>> { HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_MICROSOFT, USB_DEVICE_ID_WIRELESS_OPTICAL_DESKTOP_3_0) }, >> >>> { HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_MICROSOFT, USB_DEVICE_ID_MS_OFFICE_KB) }, >> >>> - { HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_MICROSOFT, USB_DEVICE_ID_MS_TYPE_COVER_3) }, >> >>> { HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_MICROSOFT, USB_DEVICE_ID_MS_TYPE_COVER_3_JP) }, >> >>> { HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_MONTEREY, USB_DEVICE_ID_GENIUS_KB29E) }, >> >>> { HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_MSI, USB_DEVICE_ID_MSI_GT683R_LED_PANEL) }, >> >>> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-microsoft.c b/drivers/hid/hid-microsoft.c >> >>> index af935eb..7e84463 100644 >> >>> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-microsoft.c >> >>> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-microsoft.c >> >>> @@ -276,11 +276,8 @@ static const struct hid_device_id ms_devices[] = { >> >>> .driver_data = MS_NOGET }, >> >>> { HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_MICROSOFT, USB_DEVICE_ID_MS_COMFORT_MOUSE_4500), >> >>> .driver_data = MS_DUPLICATE_USAGES }, >> >>> - { HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_MICROSOFT, USB_DEVICE_ID_MS_TYPE_COVER_3), >> >>> - .driver_data = MS_HIDINPUT }, >> >>> { HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_MICROSOFT, USB_DEVICE_ID_MS_TYPE_COVER_3_JP), >> >>> .driver_data = MS_HIDINPUT }, >> >>> - >> >> >> >> Please keep this line, it adds extra to the commit and might have been >> >> put on purpose by the original author. >> >> >> > >> > Sorry about that. I'll correct the patch without this change. >> > >> >>> { HID_BLUETOOTH_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_MICROSOFT, USB_DEVICE_ID_MS_PRESENTER_8K_BT), >> >>> .driver_data = MS_PRESENTER }, >> >>> { } >> >>> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c b/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c >> >>> index f65e78b..d93c766 100644 >> >>> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c >> >>> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c >> >>> @@ -1235,6 +1235,11 @@ static const struct hid_device_id mt_devices[] = { >> >>> MT_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_ILITEK, >> >>> USB_DEVICE_ID_ILITEK_MULTITOUCH) }, >> >>> >> >>> + /* Microsoft Type Cover 3 */ >> >>> + { .driver_data = MT_CLS_EXPORT_ALL_INPUTS, >> >>> + MT_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_MICROSOFT, >> >>> + USB_DEVICE_ID_MS_TYPE_COVER_3) }, >> >>> + >> >>> /* MosArt panels */ >> >>> { .driver_data = MT_CLS_CONFIDENCE_MINUS_ONE, >> >>> MT_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_ASUS, >> >>> -- >> >>> 2.1.0 >> >> >> >> I had a similar patch in my tree at the time when we were deciding >> >> what to do for those devices. >> >> This patch had an extra hunk (sorry gmail will cut the lines and everything): >> >> >> >> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c >> >> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c >> >> @@ -961,6 +961,9 @@ static void mt_input_configured(struct hid_device >> >> *hdev, struct hid_input *hi) >> >> case HID_DG_TOUCHSCREEN: >> >> /* we do not set suffix = "Touchscreen" */ >> >> break; >> >> + case HID_DG_TOUCHPAD: >> >> + suffix = "Touchpad"; >> >> + break; >> >> case HID_GD_SYSTEM_CONTROL: >> >> suffix = "System Control"; >> >> break; >> >> >> >> Can you please test/add this with your current patch. Your touchpad >> >> might appear as "UNKNOWN", which is not very appealing :) >> >> >> > >> > It works, now it appears with the Touchscreen suffix. I should send >> > the new patch as a response to this thread right? >> >> I guess you meant "Touchpad" here. > > Yes, I meant "Touchpad". > >> >> No need to send the v2 as a reply to this thread. Just use the subject >> prefix "PATCH v2" and that should be enough. >> >> Cheers, >> Benjamin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/