From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, oleg@redhat.com,
        paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, andi@firstfloor.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
        tglx@linutronix.de, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, linux@horizon.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/10] latched RB-trees and __module_address()
In-Reply-To: <20150414064149.GM23123@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <20150413141126.756350256@infradead.org> <87wq1fs9ha.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> <20150414064149.GM23123@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.17 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 14:11:37 +0930
Message-ID: <877fteroji.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 808
Lines: 22

Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> writes:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 12:27:05PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
>
>> I was tempted to sneak in those module rcu fixes for 4.1, but seeing
>> Ingo's comments I'll wait for 4.2.
>
> I can get you a new version of that if you want. See below. The fixups
> are unmodified of the posting (patches 2,3).

Another last-minute module-next patch just blew up some archs, so I'm
erring back to being conservative :)

I've put those three patches (2,3,1 for bisectability) into my
pending-rebases tree for now.

Thanks,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/