Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 12 Jan 2003 10:54:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 12 Jan 2003 10:54:48 -0500 Received: from pc2-cwma1-4-cust86.swan.cable.ntl.com ([213.105.254.86]:7062 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 12 Jan 2003 10:54:48 -0500 Subject: Re: UnitedLinux violating GPL? From: Alan Cox To: Hubert Mantel Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <20030112131535.GA8594@suse.de> References: <200301111634.h0BGYGUt003680@eeyore.valparaiso.cl> <10213.1042313279@passion.cambridge.redhat.com> <20030112131535.GA8594@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Message-Id: <1042390241.15051.4.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.1 (1.2.1-2) Date: 12 Jan 2003 16:50:43 +0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 865 Lines: 18 On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 13:15, Hubert Mantel wrote: > > In the opinion of many devlopers, the preferred form of the Linux kernel for > > maintaining it is a set of individual patches against the closest > > 'official' release, and not a tarball containing already-modified code. > > So you are saying that Alan Cox is violating the GPL since he releases his > -ac kernels only as one single monolithic patch against the vanilla tree, > not as individual patches (like Andrea Arcangeli does for example)? > > I think the motivation for this ridiculous thread is very obvious. I think Dave needs to type "man diff" 8) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/