Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 12 Jan 2003 12:09:02 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 12 Jan 2003 12:09:02 -0500 Received: from phoenix.mvhi.com ([195.224.96.167]:13067 "EHLO phoenix.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 12 Jan 2003 12:09:02 -0500 Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 17:17:44 +0000 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Greg KH , Alan Cox , William Lee Irwin III , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Message-ID: <20030112171744.A11040@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Linus Torvalds , Greg KH , Alan Cox , William Lee Irwin III , Linux Kernel Mailing List References: <20030112092706.GN30025@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from torvalds@transmeta.com on Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 09:05:16AM -0800 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 660 Lines: 13 On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 09:05:16AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > The only place that looked like it _really_ didn't get the kernel lock was > apparently tty_open(), which is admittedly a fairly important part of it ;) 2.5 does hold the BKL on ->open of charater- (and block-) devices. The real problem is that the big irqlock is gone and mingo just replaced it with local_irq_save & friends, which is not enough. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/