Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 12 Jan 2003 13:38:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 12 Jan 2003 13:38:36 -0500 Received: from svr-ganmtc-appserv-mgmt.ncf.coxexpress.com ([24.136.46.5]:33542 "EHLO svr-ganmtc-appserv-mgmt.ncf.coxexpress.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 12 Jan 2003 13:38:36 -0500 Subject: Re: [FIXED] 2.5 evolution problem From: Robert Love To: Shane Shrybman Cc: linux-kernel In-Reply-To: <1042395383.2397.8.camel@mars.goatskin.org> References: <1042395383.2397.8.camel@mars.goatskin.org> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1042397247.834.50.camel@phantasy> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.1 (1.2.1-4) Date: 12 Jan 2003 13:47:28 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 957 Lines: 30 On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 13:16, Shane Shrybman wrote: > The bug causing problems with the evolution address book is fixed in > 2.5.56. I don't know if it was fixed in 2.5.55 or 2.5.56 but it was > broken in 2.5.54. It was fixed in 2.5.55. It works for me now, too, without using a hacked ORBit. > This bug(#112) is listed as RESOLVED at bugme.osdl.org. Should it be > moved to CLOSED? I guess so. > Also how would one find out what the resolution was at bugme.osdl.org? > Is there a pointer to patch or cset that I missed somewhere there? Not sure if you can. You can find the fix posted to lkml, though - Michael Meeks posted it. It was a simple fix in the getpeername() code as we thought. Robert Love - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/