Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 12 Jan 2003 15:29:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 12 Jan 2003 15:23:29 -0500 Received: from svr-ganmtc-appserv-mgmt.ncf.coxexpress.com ([24.136.46.5]:32779 "EHLO svr-ganmtc-appserv-mgmt.ncf.coxexpress.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 12 Jan 2003 15:23:02 -0500 Subject: Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? From: Robert Love To: robw@optonline.net Cc: Linus Torvalds , Christoph Hellwig , Greg KH , Alan Cox , William Lee Irwin III , Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <1042400094.1208.26.camel@RobsPC.RobertWilkens.com> References: <1042400094.1208.26.camel@RobsPC.RobertWilkens.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1042403499.834.91.camel@phantasy> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.1 (1.2.1-4) Date: 12 Jan 2003 15:31:39 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 826 Lines: 22 On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 14:34, Rob Wilkens wrote: > I'm REALLY opposed to the use of the word "goto" in any code where > it's not needed. OF course, I'm a linux kernel newbie, so I'm in > no position to comment We use goto's extensively in the kernel. They generate fast, tight code. There is nothing wrong with being a newbie, but there is something wrong with voicing ignorance. "Learn first, form opinions later". When you start posting more than most of the developers here, combined, and none of your posts are contributive kernel code, there is a problem. Robert Love - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/