Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754240AbbDPRL4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Apr 2015 13:11:56 -0400 Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([92.198.50.35]:56233 "EHLO metis.ext.pengutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754762AbbDPRLt (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Apr 2015 13:11:49 -0400 Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 18:37:45 +0200 From: Robert Schwebel To: One Thousand Gnomes Cc: Austin S Hemmelgarn , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Al Viro , Andy Lutomirski , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Arnd Bergmann , "Eric W. Biederman" , Tom Gundersen , Jiri Kosina , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Daniel Mack , David Herrmann , Djalal Harouni Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.1-rc1 Message-ID: <20150416163745.GA29567@pengutronix.de> References: <20150413204547.GB1760@kroah.com> <20150414175019.GA2874@kroah.com> <20150414192357.GA6107@kroah.com> <20150414193533.GF889@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20150414194348.GA7540@kroah.com> <552EA700.7000200@gmail.com> <20150415232218.7df214ba@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150415232218.7df214ba@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> X-Sent-From: Pengutronix Hildesheim X-URL: http://www.pengutronix.de/ X-IRC: #ptxdist @freenode X-Accept-Language: de,en X-Accept-Content-Type: text/plain X-Uptime: 18:35:43 up 32 days, 21:14, 13 users, load average: 0,61, 0,72, 0,73 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:6f8:1178:4:5054:ff:fe8d:eefb X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: r.schwebel@pengutronix.de X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on metis.ext.pengutronix.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PTX-Original-Recipient: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1158 Lines: 23 On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 11:22:18PM +0100, One Thousand Gnomes wrote: > > The reason that 'everyone who works in this area' adopted is not as much > > that the design is sound (I'm not arguing whether it is or isn't in this > > case) as it is that none of them could come up with anything better. > > Actually most message passing code uses things like JMS and the various > MQ libraries. Most IoT uses things other than dbus, small deep embedded > never uses dbus. For what it's worth: we more and more use dbus for small deep embedded systems, IoT, loosely coupled industrial control applications etc. rsc -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/