Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 12 Jan 2003 15:52:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 12 Jan 2003 15:52:48 -0500 Received: from mta7.srv.hcvlny.cv.net ([167.206.5.22]:50154 "EHLO mta7.srv.hcvlny.cv.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 12 Jan 2003 15:52:48 -0500 Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 15:58:07 -0500 From: Rob Wilkens Subject: RE: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? In-reply-to: <3C6BEE8B5E1BAC42905A93F13004E8AB017DE60F@mailse01.axis.se> To: Mikael Starvik Cc: "\"'linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org \"'" , "'Linux Kernel Mailing List '" Reply-to: robw@optonline.net Message-id: <1042405087.1209.105.camel@RobsPC.RobertWilkens.com> Organization: Robert Wilkens MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.1 Content-type: text/plain Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <3C6BEE8B5E1BAC42905A93F13004E8AB017DE60F@mailse01.axis.se> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 977 Lines: 26 On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 15:23, Mikael Starvik wrote: > Why do you think Linus would not be capable of deciding > the best code to do a certain sequence of operations > in Linux? Did I imply he was incapable? Of course, making decisions requires input, and I was simply offerring input. Whether or not he reads my input is entirely up to him. My advice is free, and as such is given at face value. > In short: Linus and others does not care at all what you If he didn't care he wouldn't write back with such strong words as [Nicklaus Wirth] "doesn't have a frigging clue." Obviously Mr. Torvalds cares about the topic enough to say something. He has no obligation to explain his position to me, though. I'm a nobody. -Rob - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/