Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 22:16:57 +0200
From: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoffer Dall <cdall@cs.columbia.edu>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>, linux-next@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
        Alex =?iso-8859-1?Q?Benn=E9e?= <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm-arm tree with Linus' tree
Message-ID: <20150416201657.GG6186@cbox>
References: <20150318144111.1e56c6d9@canb.auug.org.au>
 <20150318075537.GC23225@cbox>
 <552403BF.8090008@redhat.com>
 <20150416191044.GF6186@cbox>
 <55300FDA.1010606@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <55300FDA.1010606@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 952
Lines: 26

On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 09:39:06PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> 
> 
> On 16/04/2015 21:10, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> >> > 
> > As it turns out, it was not the same logic as Stephen's resolution.
> > Stephen's resolution is bussy, because vlr is passed by value to
> > vgic_queue_irq_to_lr() and therefore the call to sync the elrsr does not
> > have any effect.
> > 
> > Unfortunately, it seems Paolo's more correct fix did not end up in
> > Linus' tree, so I guess I should just send a patch?
> 
> Uhm, sure it did :)
> 
> http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c#n1121
> 

I'm an idiot; I looked at 4.0 instead of master, sorry for the noise.

-Christoffer
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/