Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 12 Jan 2003 17:25:59 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 12 Jan 2003 17:25:59 -0500 Received: from pc2-cwma1-4-cust86.swan.cable.ntl.com ([213.105.254.86]:61590 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 12 Jan 2003 17:25:57 -0500 Subject: Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? From: Alan Cox To: robw@optonline.net Cc: Emiliano Gabrielli , Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <1042409562.1209.142.camel@RobsPC.RobertWilkens.com> References: <1042400094.1208.26.camel@RobsPC.RobertWilkens.com> <20030112211530.GP27709@mea-ext.zmailer.org> <1042406849.3162.121.camel@RobsPC.RobertWilkens.com> <1042407845.3162.131.camel@RobsPC.RobertWilkens.com> <32929.62.98.226.220.1042408728.squirrel@webmail.roma2.infn.it> <1042409562.1209.142.camel@RobsPC.RobertWilkens.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Message-Id: <1042413711.16288.45.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.1 (1.2.1-2) Date: 12 Jan 2003 23:21:52 +0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 763 Lines: 18 On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 22:12, Rob Wilkens wrote: > On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 16:58, Emiliano Gabrielli wrote: > > you do, if you inline the code and every drive writer use this tecnique the kernel will > > be much bigger don't you think ?!? > > Kernel size (footprint in memory) would grow a tad bit (not much), but > it's overall speed would also go up. Wrong. Thats the trouble with programming an abstract level. People just don't understand the real world. Cache is everything, small cache footprint is king. Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/