Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 12:45:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 12:45:40 -0500 Received: from delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl ([153.19.144.1]:49811 "EHLO delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 12:45:24 -0500 Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 18:43:02 +0100 (MET) From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" To: "David D.W. Downey" cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: APIC problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Organization: Technical University of Gdansk MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, David D.W. Downey wrote: > I can see that the error codes are actually the values of ESR both before > and after the apic_write() call. I see that the codes are the modulus'd > value before and after the apic_write call. What I'm not understanding is > how to translate that into a valid ID for determining what the exact error > is. In this instance 08 doesn't appear to be a valid return. Or am I > missing something here?? "08" is "3: Receive accept error" -- all codes are explained in smp_error_interrupt(). And yes, bits 0 - 3 indicate hardware problems (due to marginal design, overheating, etc.), especially if seen in volume. -- + Maciej W. Rozycki, Technical University of Gdansk, Poland + +--------------------------------------------------------------+ + e-mail: macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl, PGP key available + - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/