Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 12 Jan 2003 18:15:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 12 Jan 2003 18:15:56 -0500 Received: from ophelia.ess.nec.de ([193.141.139.8]:59827 "EHLO ophelia.ess.nec.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Sun, 12 Jan 2003 18:15:43 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Erich Focht To: Bill Davidsen Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] Minature NUMA scheduler Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 00:24:48 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 Cc: linux-kernel , lse-tech References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: <200301130024.48571.efocht@ess.nec.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 732 Lines: 18 On Saturday 11 January 2003 15:43, Bill Davidsen wrote: > Agreed, but honestly just this explanation would make it easier to > understand! I'm not sure you have the "balance of nodes" trigger defined > quite right, but I'm assuming if this gets implemented as described that > some long term umbalance detector mechanism will be run occasionally. Yes, the current plan is to extend the miniature NUMA scheduler by a inter-node balancer which is called less frequently. Regards, Erich - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/