Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 12 Jan 2003 20:52:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 12 Jan 2003 20:52:10 -0500 Received: from pcp01184434pcs.strl301.mi.comcast.net ([68.60.187.197]:15843 "EHLO mythical") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 12 Jan 2003 20:52:09 -0500 Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 21:00:51 -0500 From: Ryan Anderson To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Message-ID: <20030113020051.GI12020@michonline.com> Mail-Followup-To: Linux Kernel Mailing List References: <200301122306.14411.oliver@neukum.name> <1042410145.3162.152.camel@RobsPC.RobertWilkens.com> <200301122343.41150.oliver@neukum.name> <1042411916.1209.181.camel@RobsPC.RobertWilkens.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1042411916.1209.181.camel@RobsPC.RobertWilkens.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 05:51:57PM -0500, Rob Wilkens wrote: > On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 17:43, Oliver Neukum wrote: > > It's code that causes added hardship for anybody checking the locking. > > I can certainly see where it would seem "easier" to match "one lock" to > "one unlock" if your troubleshooting a locking issue. > > "easier" is the motivation behind using goto.. Laziness.. that's all it > is. Have you ever read "Programming Perl"? Laziness is a virtue. (At least I think that's the right book - possibly the 3rd edition.) -- Ryan Anderson sometimes Pug Majere - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/