Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753195AbbDTVHj (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Apr 2015 17:07:39 -0400 Received: from mail-pd0-f170.google.com ([209.85.192.170]:34563 "EHLO mail-pd0-f170.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752222AbbDTVHg (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Apr 2015 17:07:36 -0400 From: Kevin Hilman To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Cc: Thomas Abraham , Sylwester Nawrocki , Mike Turquette , Kukjin Kim , Kukjin Kim , Viresh Kumar , Lukasz Majewski , Heiko Stuebner , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Tomasz Figa , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chanwoo Choi , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, Javier Martinez Canillas , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers for Exynos5250 platform References: <1428946441-17058-1-git-send-email-b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 14:07:33 -0700 In-Reply-To: <1428946441-17058-1-git-send-email-b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> (Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz's message of "Mon, 13 Apr 2015 19:33:57 +0200") Message-ID: <7h1tjeh5ka.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1411 Lines: 37 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz writes: > Hi, > > This patch series removes the use of Exynos5250 specific support > from exynos-cpufreq driver and enables the use of cpufreq-dt driver > for this platform. The exynos-cpufreq driver itself is also removed > as it is no longer used/needed after Exynos5250 support removal. > > This patch series has been tested on Exynos5250 based Arndale board. > > Depends on: > - next-20150330 branch of linux-next kernel tree > - "[PATCH 0/6] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers for Exynos4210 > platform" [1] > - "[PATCH 0/6] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers for Exynos4x12 > platform" [2] > - "[PATCH] cpufreq: exynos: remove dead ->need_apll_change method" [3] Any chance you could prepare a branch with all the dependencies for easy testing? Also, The previous version from Thomas was v12, and this one is neither versioned nor has any reference to what may have changed since that version. Also, on v12, I had several comments[1] and wonder if they've been addressed. Kevin [1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.power-management.general/53494/match=patch+v12+0+6+use+generic+cpufreq -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/