Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755504AbbDULmY (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Apr 2015 07:42:24 -0400 Received: from mail4.hitachi.co.jp ([133.145.228.5]:60864 "EHLO mail4.hitachi.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751575AbbDULmS (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Apr 2015 07:42:18 -0400 Message-ID: <55363791.4070706@hitachi.com> Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 20:42:09 +0900 From: Masami Hiramatsu Organization: Hitachi, Ltd., Japan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Long CC: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Russell King , sandeepa.s.prabhu@gmail.com, William Cohen , Steve Capper , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , "Jon Medhurst (Tixy)" , Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli , Anil S Keshavamurthy , davem@davemloft.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/6] arm64: Add kernel probes (kprobes) support References: <1429561187-3661-1-git-send-email-dave.long@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: <1429561187-3661-1-git-send-email-dave.long@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2349 Lines: 56 (2015/04/21 5:19), David Long wrote: > From: "David A. Long" > > This patchset is heavily based on Sandeepa Prabhu's ARM v8 kprobes patches, > first seen in October 2013. This version attempts to address concerns raised by > reviewers and also fixes problems discovered during testing. > > This patchset adds support for kernel probes(kprobes), jump probes(jprobes) > and return probes(kretprobes) support for ARM64. > > The kprobes mechanism makes use of software breakpoint and single stepping > support available in the ARM v8 kernel. > [...] > Changes since v5 include: > > 1) Replaced installation of breakpoint hook with direct call from the > handlers in debug-monitors.c, as requested. > 2) Reject probing of instructions that read the interrupt mask, in > addition to instructions that set it. > 3) Cleaned up comments describing usage of Debug Mask. > 4) Added KPROBE_REENTER case in reenter_kprobe. > 5) Corrected the ifdef'd definitions for notify_page_fault() to be > consistent when KPROBES is not configed. > 6) Changed "cpsr" to "pstate" for HAVE_REGS_AND_STACK_ACCESS_API feature. > 7) Added back in missing new files in previous patch. > 8) Changed two instances of pr_warning() to pr_warn(). Looks OK to me:) BTW, have you tried to build and test this with CONFIG_KPROBE_EVENT? If so, you can also test it by tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/ftracetest. > Note that there seems to be at least a potential issue with kprobes > on multiple (possibly all) platforms having to do with use of kfree > inside of the kretprobes trampoline handler. This has manifested > occasionally in systemtap testing on arm64. There does not appear to > be an simple solution to the problem. No, trampoline handler must call recycle_rp_inst() instead of kfree to return kretprobe instance to the pool. Hmm, I should look into it. Thank you, -- Masami HIRAMATSU Linux Technology Research Center, System Productivity Research Dept. Center for Technology Innovation - Systems Engineering Hitachi, Ltd., Research & Development Group E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/