Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 17:26:00 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>,
        Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@ezchip.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
        "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
        Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] context_tracking: Inherit TIF_NOHZ through forks
 instead of context switches
Message-ID: <20150421152600.GE3182@worktop.meeting.verilan.com>
References: <1429618989-11104-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com>
 <1429618989-11104-3-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1429618989-11104-3-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22.1 (2013-10-16)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1216
Lines: 38

On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 02:23:07PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> +void __init context_tracking_cpu_set(int cpu)
>  {
> +	static __initdata bool initialized = false;
> +	struct task_struct *p, *t;
> +
> +	if (!per_cpu(context_tracking.active, cpu)) {
> +		per_cpu(context_tracking.active, cpu) = true;
> +		static_key_slow_inc(&context_tracking_enabled);
> +	}
> +
> +	if (initialized)
> +		return;
> +
> +	set_tsk_thread_flag(&init_task, TIF_NOHZ);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * There shouldn't be any thread at this early boot stage
> +	 * but the scheduler is ready to host any. So lets walk
> +	 * the tasklist just in case. tasklist_lock isn't necessary
> +	 * either that early but take it for correctness checkers.
> +	 */
> +	read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
> +	for_each_process_thread(p, t)
> +		set_tsk_thread_flag(t, TIF_NOHZ);

If there should not be any task, should there not be a WARN_ON_ONCE()
here?

> +	read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
> +
> +	initialized = true;
>  }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/