Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 13 Jan 2003 10:17:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 13 Jan 2003 10:17:45 -0500 Received: from kweetal.tue.nl ([131.155.2.7]:30417 "EHLO kweetal.tue.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 13 Jan 2003 10:17:45 -0500 Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:26:34 +0100 From: Andries Brouwer To: Ludovic Drolez Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: BLKBSZSET still not working on 2.4.18 ? Message-ID: <20030113152634.GA20960@win.tue.nl> References: <3E1EE7A3.1050401@freealter.com> <20030110161331.GA19942@win.tue.nl> <3E22A2E4.2000604@freealter.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3E22A2E4.2000604@freealter.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 12:28:36PM +0100, Ludovic Drolez wrote: > >You can test 2.5. If it is wrong there I must submit a patch. > It seems to work perfectly with 2.5.56 Excellent. > But, I'm still reluctant to use an unstable kernel for backuping a > partition. But maybe the 2.5 is stable enough to read blocks from > IDE/SCSI drives, and send them over NFSv2 / IPv4 ? Stable / unstable is not a binary decision. Some things are broken in 2.4. Many things are broken in 2.5. Still I use 2.5.recent on a daily basis without meeting bad problems (if I refrain from inserting and removing USB devices). Try, and if it works for you, fine. But no guarantees given. Andries - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/