Message-ID: <55391B3C.60108@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 12:18:04 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: eunb.song@samsung.com
CC: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools/liblockdep: change current_obj from thread-local
 storage to non thread-local storage
References: <1635690742.249841429772120132.JavaMail.weblogic@epmlwas03d>
In-Reply-To: <1635690742.249841429772120132.JavaMail.weblogic@epmlwas03d>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=euc-kr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 3633
Lines: 128

On 04/23/2015 02:55 AM, Eunbong Song wrote:
> current_obj is declared as a thread-local storage.
> This prevent to detect locking  problem between multiple threads because
> each thread has it's own current_obj. liblockdep can only detect locking problem in a single
> thread. However, pthread_mutex_xxx, pthread_rwlock_xxx functions are mainly used for synchro
> nization of data between multiple threads.
> This patch changes current_obj to non thread-local storage. and current_obj.pid is getting
> from getpid system call.

um... It always worked with threads:

$ cat tests/ABBA_threads.c
#include <liblockdep/mutex.h>
#include "common.h"

pthread_mutex_t a, b;

void *thread_a(void *arg)
{
	LOCK_UNLOCK_2(a, b);

	return NULL;
}

void *thread_b(void *arg)
{
	LOCK_UNLOCK_2(b, a);

	return NULL;
}

void main(void)
{
	pthread_t ta, tb;

	pthread_mutex_init(&a, NULL);
	pthread_mutex_init(&b, NULL);

	pthread_create(&ta, NULL, thread_a, NULL);
	pthread_create(&tb, NULL, thread_b, NULL);

	pthread_join(ta, NULL);
	pthread_join(tb, NULL);
}
$ tests/ABBA_threads

======================================================
[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
liblockdep 4.0.0
-------------------------------------------------------
ABBA_threads/12101 is trying to acquire lock:
 (0x10bb700){......}, at: tests/ABBA_threads() [0x401333]

but task is already holding lock:
 (0x10bb680){......}, at: tests/ABBA_threads() [0x401333]

which lock already depends on the new lock.


the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #1 (0x10bb680){......}:
tests/ABBA_threads[0x4019d3]
tests/ABBA_threads[0x4036f6]
tests/ABBA_threads[0x4039c2]
tests/ABBA_threads[0x403fde]
tests/ABBA_threads[0x404aa7]
tests/ABBA_threads[0x405250]
tests/ABBA_threads[0x4053d3]
tests/ABBA_threads[0x4055cd]
tests/ABBA_threads[0x40135d]
tests/ABBA_threads[0x401395]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0(+0x80a5)[0x7f8e6e1dc0a5]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(clone+0x6d)[0x7f8e6df09cfd]

-> #0 (0x10bb700){......}:
tests/ABBA_threads[0x4019d3]
tests/ABBA_threads[0x402f51]
tests/ABBA_threads[0x4035c4]
tests/ABBA_threads[0x4039c2]
tests/ABBA_threads[0x403fde]
tests/ABBA_threads[0x404aa7]
tests/ABBA_threads[0x405565]
tests/ABBA_threads(pthread_mutex_lock+0x51)[0x4063fd]
tests/ABBA_threads[0x401333]
tests/ABBA_threads[0x4013c6]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0(+0x80a5)[0x7f8e6e1dc0a5]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(clone+0x6d)[0x7f8e6df09cfd]

other info that might help us debug this:

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(0x10bb680);
                               lock(0x10bb700);
                               lock(0x10bb680);
  lock(0x10bb700);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

2 locks held by ABBA_threads/12101:
 #0:  (&b){......}, at: tests/ABBA_threads() [0x4013bc]
 #1:  (0x10bb680){......}, at: tests/ABBA_threads() [0x401333]

stack backtrace:
tests/ABBA_threads[0x4016dd]
tests/ABBA_threads[0x40300b]
tests/ABBA_threads[0x4035c4]
tests/ABBA_threads[0x4039c2]
tests/ABBA_threads[0x403fde]
tests/ABBA_threads[0x404aa7]
tests/ABBA_threads[0x405565]
tests/ABBA_threads(pthread_mutex_lock+0x51)[0x4063fd]
tests/ABBA_threads[0x401333]
tests/ABBA_threads[0x4013c6]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0(+0x80a5)[0x7f8e6e1dc0a5]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(clone+0x6d)[0x7f8e6df09cfd]


Thanks,
Sasha
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/