Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 13 Jan 2003 17:41:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 13 Jan 2003 17:41:57 -0500 Received: from neon-gw-l3.transmeta.com ([63.209.4.196]:52234 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 13 Jan 2003 17:41:55 -0500 Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 14:48:45 -0800 (PST) From: Linus Torvalds To: Adam Belay cc: Jaroslav Kysela , Greg KH , Zwane Mwaikambo , Shawn Starr , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH] PnP update - drivers In-Reply-To: <20030113173906.GA605@neo.rr.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Adam Belay wrote: > > I'm now unhappy with the current pnp code and will most likely revert all pnp > changes between 2.5.56 and 2.5.57 to avoid a merging nightmare. I will then > carefully remerge what I feel is acceptable. I will _not_ accept just stupid reverts, if that means that a device driver is not available for people to test with. We do not break drivers like that, and the reason you have clashes with other people is that so many drivers ended up being broken for too long. Feel free to revert the changes one by one _as_they_get_fixed_. But don't even try to send me a patch that reverts things to a broken state. The PnP changes have been painful enough as-is. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/