Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753283AbbDXCIb (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Apr 2015 22:08:31 -0400 Received: from mail-lb0-f170.google.com ([209.85.217.170]:33804 "EHLO mail-lb0-f170.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753168AbbDXCIa (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Apr 2015 22:08:30 -0400 Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 04:08:30 +0200 From: Karol Lewandowski To: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Paul Osmialowski Cc: Stephen Smalley , Karol Lewandowski , Andy Lutomirski , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Arnd Bergmann , "Eric W. Biederman" , One Thousand Gnomes , Tom Gundersen , Jiri Kosina , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Daniel Mack , David Herrmann , Djalal Harouni , k.lewandowsk@samsung.com Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.1-rc1 Message-ID: <20150424020830.GC25549@pix> References: <20150413190350.GA9485@kroah.com> <20150423130548.GA4253@kroah.com> <20150423163616.GA10874@kroah.com> <20150423171640.GA11227@kroah.com> <55392F01.1090307@tycho.nsa.gov> <20150423193013.GA14365@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150423193013.GA14365@kroah.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1755 Lines: 36 On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 09:30:13PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 01:42:25PM -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote: > > On 04/23/2015 01:16 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > The binder developers at Samsung have stated that the implementation we > > > have here works for their model as well, so I guess that is some kind of > > > verification it's not entirely tied to D-Bus. They have plans on > > > dropping the existing binder kernel code and using the kdbus code > > > instead when it is merged. > > > > Where do things stand wrt LSM hooks for kdbus? I don't see any security > > hook calls in the kdbus tree except for the purpose of metadata > > collection of process security labels. But nothing for enforcing MAC > > over kdbus IPC. binder has a set of security hooks for that purpose, so > > it would be a regression wrt MAC enforcement to switch from binder to > > kdbus without equivalent checking there. > > There was a set of LSM hooks proposed for kdbus posted by Karol > Lewandowsk last October, and it also included SELinux and Smack patches. > They were going to be refreshed based on the latest code changes, but I > haven't seen them posted, or I can't seem to find them in my limited > email archive. We have been waiting for right moment with these. :-) > Karol, what's the status of them? I have handed patchset over to Paul Osmialowski who started rework it for v4 relatively recently. I think it shouldn't be that hard to post updated version... Paul? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/