Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 13 Jan 2003 17:44:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 13 Jan 2003 17:44:36 -0500 Received: from modemcable092.130-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca ([24.200.130.92]:54616 "EHLO montezuma.mastecende.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 13 Jan 2003 17:44:31 -0500 Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 17:53:20 -0500 (EST) From: Zwane Mwaikambo X-X-Sender: zwane@montezuma.mastecende.com To: "Nakajima, Jun" cc: "Protasevich, Natalie" , "Martin J. Bligh" , "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" , William Lee Irwin III , Christoph Hellwig , James Cleverdon , Linux Kernel Subject: RE: APIC version In-Reply-To: <3014AAAC8E0930438FD38EBF6DCEB5647D1026@fmsmsx407.fm.intel.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Nakajima, Jun wrote: > The entries in acpi_version[] are indexed by the APIC id, not > smp_processor_id(). So you can overwrite acpi_version[] for a different > processor. Is it possible to use smp_processor_id instead to avoid wasting memory for the sparse APIC id case? Zwane -- function.linuxpower.ca - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/