Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S966580AbbDXIfI (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Apr 2015 04:35:08 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:41259 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S966351AbbDXIfF (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Apr 2015 04:35:05 -0400 Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 10:35:01 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Borislav Petkov Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Arnd Bergmann , gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, teg@jklm.no, jkosina@suse.cz, luto@amacapital.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, daniel@zonque.org, dh.herrmann@gmail.com, tixxdz@opendz.org Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.1-rc1 Message-ID: <20150424083501.GB7782@kroah.com> References: <20150413190350.GA9485@kroah.com> <8738434yjk.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <20150422085827.GA6962@pd.tnic> <20150423191433.GB13607@kroah.com> <20150423205640.GR28327@pd.tnic> <20150424063603.GA4790@kroah.com> <20150424064515.GA5103@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150424064515.GA5103@kroah.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1816 Lines: 39 On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 08:45:15AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 08:36:03AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 10:56:40PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > > > Hm, this seems to be to be O(1), pretty constant, we do the same amount > > > > of work all the time. > > > > > > The same *pile* of unnecessary and needless work. You go and collect > > > *all* that data on *every* packet send?! > > > > No, not at all, the metadata is cached, we only collect that for the > > first message sent, if we didn't know it already, or we do it on the > > "open" of the connection, depending on what we are gathering metadata > > for. > > > > The mc->collected test right before collecting the specific metadata is > > that "cached or not" test. > > Oh wait, no, there are some send-time metadata that is collected for > every message, see Linus's email for more details about that. Maybe > this can be changed to cache things even more than we currently do. > > it's early, shouldn't write emails before coffee... > > David had some flamegraphs floating around that showed where all the > time on transmit / receive was being spent, and I don't think that the > metadata area was all that relevant, but I can't find them anymore to > say for sure. There are other areas that can be sped up on the send > path, but perf data is the best way to verify this. Here's the graphs that he posted during the last code review cycle that are relevant here: http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1503.2/02624.html greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/