Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753231AbbDYD7A (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Apr 2015 23:59:00 -0400 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:56500 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753035AbbDYD65 (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Apr 2015 23:58:57 -0400 Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 23:58:53 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <20150424.235853.1997287895150693202.davem@davemloft.net> To: mkl@pengutronix.de Cc: joe@perches.com, m.grzeschik@pengutronix.de, netdev@vger.kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/21] ARCNET: Defibrillation From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <553AB241.3080004@pengutronix.de> References: <1429896055-31680-1-git-send-email-m.grzeschik@pengutronix.de> <1429901273.23327.5.camel@perches.com> <553AB241.3080004@pengutronix.de> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.6 on Emacs 24.4 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.12 (shards.monkeyblade.net [149.20.54.216]); Fri, 24 Apr 2015 20:58:57 -0700 (PDT) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1516 Lines: 40 From: Marc Kleine-Budde Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 23:14:41 +0200 > On 04/24/2015 08:47 PM, Joe Perches wrote: >> On Fri, 2015-04-24 at 19:20 +0200, Michael Grzeschik wrote: >>> Hi! >> >> Hello. >> >>> This patch series tries to reanimate the ARCNET hardware layer to be >>> somehow readable and maintainable again. It includes a lot of cleanup >>> patches. It also adds some fixes which leads the layer to become usable >>> again. And as a special treatment it adds more features like correct >>> loading and unloading of the com20020 card. >> >> Wow. Good for you, but why? Does anyone still use these? > > Yes, there are parts of the industry where "old" machines are > retrofitted with new hardware...and a lot of these machines still talk > ARCNET :) But the real issue is, this layer is development wise in the same category as the IDE layer. Any non-trivial change is nothing but pure risk, especially given the low level of test coverage the code gets. So I really only want to see the most critical obvious bug fixes submitted for this layer and drivers. And no I will not accept an argument stating that you have to restructure and clean this code up in order to fix the bugs. That's bogus. I'm rejecting this patch series, sorry. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/