Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 14 Jan 2003 00:52:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 14 Jan 2003 00:52:46 -0500 Received: from havoc.daloft.com ([64.213.145.173]:3301 "EHLO havoc.gtf.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 14 Jan 2003 00:52:46 -0500 Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 01:01:30 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik To: Louis Zhuang Cc: jgarzik@redhat.com, scott.feldman@intel.com, LKML Subject: Re: [BUG FIX] e100 initialization issue on STL2 motherboard Message-ID: <20030114060130.GA10631@gtf.org> References: <1042523515.3951.12.camel@hawk.sh.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1042523515.3951.12.camel@hawk.sh.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 01:51:55PM +0800, Louis Zhuang wrote: > The patch will increase waiting time in SCB initialization. It will > resolve the issue on STL2 motherboard. Pls apply. Sorry, not applied. I was kinda hoping Scott would fix that up. It is a verified problem (SMBus timeout, IIRC?), and this does indeed fix the problem. However one should not udelay() that long -- especially in this case. Since it is during init, sleep using schedule_timeout() for as long as you want... > begin 664 bkpatch4832 Please do not bother with sending BK patches like this. Either send just the diff, as you did (thanks), or in addition send a URL from which I may issue bk pull $url Regards, Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/