Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 14 Jan 2003 07:41:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 14 Jan 2003 07:41:46 -0500 Received: from verein.lst.de ([212.34.181.86]:4102 "EHLO verein.lst.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 14 Jan 2003 07:41:46 -0500 Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 13:50:33 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Tigran Aivazian Cc: Hugh Dickins , torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] don't create regular files in devfs (fwd) Message-ID: <20030114135033.A15280@lst.de> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Tigran Aivazian , Hugh Dickins , torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20030114113135.A14279@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from tigran@veritas.com on Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 11:48:58AM +0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 11:48:58AM +0000, Tigran Aivazian wrote: > a) if devfs is available it provides a regular file whose size can be > examined by applications and content read/written without much "fuss". In > particular it is very convenient to say "vi microcode" and examine the > content directly. If it was a device node then this would have been > impossible. What do you think about adding a sysvfs attribute for that instead in 2.5? This seems to be the much more logical interface to me.. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/