Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965321AbbD1Kxv (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Apr 2015 06:53:51 -0400 Received: from mailout4.w1.samsung.com ([210.118.77.14]:29922 "EHLO mailout4.w1.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965219AbbD1Kxq (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Apr 2015 06:53:46 -0400 X-AuditID: cbfec7f5-f794b6d000001495-e9-553f66bcd48f Message-id: <553F66B6.9020504@samsung.com> Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 12:53:42 +0200 From: Lukasz Skalski User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-version: 1.0 To: David Lang Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Havoc Pennington , Andy Lutomirski , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Arnd Bergmann , "Eric W. Biederman" , One Thousand Gnomes , Tom Gundersen , Jiri Kosina , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Daniel Mack , David Herrmann , Djalal Harouni Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.1-rc1 References: <20150413190350.GA9485@kroah.com> <20150423130548.GA4253@kroah.com> <20150423163616.GA10874@kroah.com> <20150423171640.GA11227@kroah.com> <553A4A2F.5090406@samsung.com> <553A547A.1060505@samsung.com> <20150424192546.GA13543@kroah.com> <553DFA09.9000605@samsung.com> In-reply-to: Content-type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrHIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVy+t/xq7p70uxDDf4/VrKYs34Nm8XfScfY LZr+vmKxaOu7xWoxr/Uoi8X/bS3sFpOm/GWzaF68ns1i8by5LBa75yxmsbi8aw6bxeq1DawW CydvYrFY+Xs7m8WjvrfsDvwe99/8ZfH4/WsSo8fOWXfZPf786mPx+PHsBLvHiRm/WTz2z13D 7tF6chOrx4pfR9g9Ll5S9jizAMj4vEnOY8qhdhaP7buXswTwRXHZpKTmZJalFunbJXBl3F50 l6ngF0vF4YVfmBoY3zN3MXJySAiYSCx608QCYYtJXLi3nq2LkYtDSGApo0TrpSZGCOcZo8Tu D4vYQKp4BbQkTjaeYe9i5OBgEVCV2PrOBiTMJqAj8eTkfSaQsKhAhMTty5wQ1YISPybfA5sv IiAnMf/pJbCRzALnWCQWtnczgiSEBTQlVh5dBbXrEbPEsnsrwXZxCjhKbL25gBlkKLOAnsT9 i1ogYWYBeYnNa94yT2AUmIVkxyyEqllIqhYwMq9iFE0tTS4oTkrPNdIrTswtLs1L10vOz93E CInFrzsYlx6zOsQowMGoxMNbwGUfKsSaWFZcmXuIUYKDWUmENyAZKMSbklhZlVqUH19UmpNa fIhRmoNFSZx35q73IUIC6YklqdmpqQWpRTBZJg5OqQbGzVJP7LtWLnngf1WyNnZWbF7syVTL 3Zeey0YrdmZfbpQQMP/g2SCjHiwQdfacaFRd8Zm5W5miFAWFbGu151VEz/6+3VPywZ4dW5RO tDGYbdv0k/uZYJzZtc5+xwkdAk0V81fN/PRFmPOyUNfZ1Gz7KzMWLtwgWKO0wLlQ95d97+Mb tw4vePFEiaU4I9FQi7moOBEA7pSZ0sECAAA= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 858 Lines: 26 On 04/28/2015 12:29 AM, David Lang wrote: > On Mon, 27 Apr 2015, Lukasz Skalski wrote: > > aren't we being told that part of the reason for needing kdbus is that > thousands, or tens of thousands of messages are being spewed out? how > does limiting it to 128 messages represent real-life if this is the case? > AFAIK, at this moment some limits (like for example maximum number of queued requests waiting for a reply or ) for both - DBus daemon and kdbus, are the same (or at least quite similar). > David Lang > > -- Lukasz Skalski Samsung R&D Institute Poland Samsung Electronics l.skalski@samsung.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/