Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030601AbbD1RHZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Apr 2015 13:07:25 -0400 Received: from down.free-electrons.com ([37.187.137.238]:60088 "EHLO mail.free-electrons.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030398AbbD1RHY (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Apr 2015 13:07:24 -0400 Message-ID: <553FBE4A.9080603@free-electrons.com> Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 19:07:22 +0200 From: Gregory CLEMENT User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Russell King - ARM Linux CC: Valentin Rothberg , Paul Bolle , jason@lakedaemon.net, andrew@lunn.ch, sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch/arm/mach-mvebu/Kconfig: remove obsolete selects References: <1430236970-14194-1-git-send-email-valentinrothberg@gmail.com> <553FB845.30002@free-electrons.com> <20150428165428.GF12732@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20150428165428.GF12732@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1669 Lines: 53 Hi Russell, On 28/04/2015 18:54, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 06:41:41PM +0200, Gregory CLEMENT wrote: >> Hi Valentin, >> >> On 28/04/2015 18:02, Valentin Rothberg wrote: >>> ARM_ERRATA_753970 is not defined in Kconfig, so that both selects turn >>> out to be nops. Hence, we can safely remove them. >> >> It was already pointed by Paul Bolle a few months ago: >> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1868817 >> >> and I thought it was applied. >> >> He pointed that the original intent was to select >> PL310_ERRATA_753970. Initially I was not sure if we needed it. In the >> meantime I didn't get any answer from the hardware designers but this >> errata affects the r3p0 version and according to the Cache ID register >> the PL310 used on these two SoCs were the r3p3. > > It's probably something I need to look at when I'm in a more relaxed > state, and when I have more time to deal with the dreaded email > backlog... Do you see any mistake in my reasoning? Do you think that errata 753970 could be applied on PL310 version more recent than the r3p0 one ? Do you think that Cache ID register could give incorrect information about the PL310 version? Or maybe you think about something more global. Thanks, Gregory -- Gregory Clement, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/