Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030698AbbD1SRb (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Apr 2015 14:17:31 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:37217 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030316AbbD1SRa (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Apr 2015 14:17:30 -0400 Message-ID: <1430245038.2004.21.camel@stgolabs.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] locking/rwsem: reduce spinlock contention in wakeup after up_read/up_write From: Davidlohr Bueso To: Waiman Long Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jason Low , Scott J Norton , Douglas Hatch Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 11:17:18 -0700 In-Reply-To: <553E9B25.4060802@hp.com> References: <1429898069-28907-1-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hp.com> <1429907956.10273.65.camel@stgolabs.net> <553E9B25.4060802@hp.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.11 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1547 Lines: 37 On Mon, 2015-04-27 at 16:25 -0400, Waiman Long wrote: > >> + /* > >> + * up_write() cleared the owner field before calling this function. > >> + * If that field is now set, a writer must have stolen the lock and > >> + * the wakeup operation should be aborted. > >> + */ > >> + if (rwsem_has_active_writer(sem)) > >> + goto out; > > We currently allow small races between rwsem owner and counter checks. > > And __rwsem_do_wake() can be called by checking the former -- and lock > > stealing is done with the counter as well. Please see below how we back > > out of such cases, as it is very much considered when granting the next > > reader. So nack to this as is, sorry. > > If the first one in the queue is a writer, wake_up_process() may be > called directly which can be quite expensive if the lock has already > been stolen as the task will have to sleep again. But how can this occur? Lock stealing takes form in two places: 1) fastpath: only if the counter is 0 -- which, since we are discussing waking up waiter(s) code, obviously cannot occur. 2) With the cmpxchg() in rwsem_try_write_lock(), which is serialized with the wait_lock, so again this cannot occur. Which is why this is not considered in __rwsem_do_wake() when waking the writer fist in the queue. Thanks, Davidlohr -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/