Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 14 Jan 2003 14:43:59 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 14 Jan 2003 14:43:58 -0500 Received: from poup.poupinou.org ([195.101.94.96]:775 "EHLO poup.poupinou.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 14 Jan 2003 14:43:58 -0500 Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 20:52:35 +0100 To: "P. Christeas" Cc: Ducrot Bruno , Pavel Machek , "Grover, Andrew" , acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [ACPI] acpi_wakeup fixes: Patch? Message-ID: <20030114195235.GM12516@poup.poupinou.org> References: <20021217202142.GB1012@poup.poupinou.org> <200301141956.23716.p_christ@hol.gr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200301141956.23716.p_christ@hol.gr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i From: Ducrot Bruno Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 07:56:23PM +0200, P. Christeas wrote: > It seems you have been trying to correct the acpi_wakeup code (back at 17 > Dec). Has that been merged to Linus' tree? > > I got 2.5.58 today, acpi_wakeup.S is still dated 16 Dec and that patch > regarding the location of the wakeup asm code (see the '2.5.51: sleep > broken') has not reached me through Linus' patches. For me, this patch is correct. Don't know why it is not merged. Cheers, -- Ducrot Bruno -- Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? -- Don't know. Don't care. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/