Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 14 Jan 2003 15:14:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 14 Jan 2003 15:14:04 -0500 Received: from mail5.intermedia.net ([206.40.48.155]:32527 "EHLO mail5.intermedia.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 14 Jan 2003 15:14:03 -0500 Subject: Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? From: Ranjeet Shetye To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20030114193758.GB15412@mark.mielke.cc> References: <20030106173949.GA1712@gnuppy.monkey.org> <20030107141758.GA10770@gnuppy.monkey.org> <20030108115327.GA5020@gnuppy.monkey.org> <20030110101043.A19070@uph.com> <20030112125849.A28266@uph.com> <20030114193758.GB15412@mark.mielke.cc> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.5 Date: 14 Jan 2003 12:23:32 +0100 Message-Id: <1042543412.564.21.camel@ranjeet-linux-1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org hi Richard, At the point in time when you started the GNU project, do you mind telling us how much of the GNU code was based on BSD and how much was not ? I am asking for a reasonably accurate percentage e.g. 20% BSD, 80% non-BSD, OR 85% BSD, 15% non-BSD. Something to that effect. Comments/Code/Headers whatever originated from the BSD team gets attributed to them, and the modifications you guys wrote are credited to the GNU project. Also, someone posted that the original GNU code was based on the BSD code and therefore the BSD licence, and one fine day the BSD licence was replaced with the GNU licence. Is that correct or incorrect ? thanks, Ranjeet Shetye. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/