Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1423551AbbD2PGm (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Apr 2015 11:06:42 -0400 Received: from mailout1.w1.samsung.com ([210.118.77.11]:37822 "EHLO mailout1.w1.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1423038AbbD2PGg (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Apr 2015 11:06:36 -0400 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed X-AuditID: cbfec7f5-f794b6d000001495-bb-5540f37f9617 Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT Message-id: <5540F378.9010106@samsung.com> Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 17:06:32 +0200 From: Jacek Anaszewski User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130804 Thunderbird/17.0.8 To: Stas Sergeev Cc: linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, Linux kernel , Stas Sergeev Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] leds: blink resolution improvements References: <553E6CF5.4030601@list.ru> <553F4B60.20204@samsung.com> <553F5CFF.9090601@list.ru> <553F83DC.8080701@samsung.com> <553F8A7F.7040700@list.ru> In-reply-to: <553F8A7F.7040700@list.ru> X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFjrILMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVy+t/xy7r1nx1CDeZuF7G4vGsOm8XWN+sY LVo3NTBbdPZNY3Fg8bi35TKzR9OpdlaPz5vkApijuGxSUnMyy1KL9O0SuDIO3zrGWLBFqmLS 4T/sDYxNol2MnBwSAiYSG/7fY4WwxSQu3FvP1sXIxSEksJRR4vfdQ+wgCV4BQYkfk++xdDFy cDALyEscuZQNEmYWMJN41LKOGaL+GaPEgUm7mSDqtSR+XLrBAmKzCKhKrN98khHEZhMwlPj5 4jVYjahAhMSf0/tYQWaKAM3c0FgGMbNC4vfnU2DlwgL2Epv3r4CaP4dRYs3yw2AJTgF1iX2t 3xgnMArMQnLeLITzZiE5bwEj8ypG0dTS5ILipPRcI73ixNzi0rx0veT83E2MkID9uoNx6TGr Q4wCHIxKPLwSJg6hQqyJZcWVuYcYJTiYlUR4/d8BhXhTEiurUovy44tKc1KLDzFKc7AoifPO 3PU+REggPbEkNTs1tSC1CCbLxMEp1cCocDEuWlCc6ek/v4i3Xyf+eKNdZLHi611uxQsJPI/r D9scvXZmQsSUTH2N10/VP/mk9f34JTznWOSv35F39Hr3iO30+XR80ocPTI/27W14cm2u6Yof +93WBBlHp5o/Vj1dOyc2/LDJ6/y8yd3xnxn2vWNaJF59V6NCVfrt/Vyd6LfP2Z12NqmyKrEU ZyQaajEXFScCALKLF4hUAgAA Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3546 Lines: 84 On 04/28/2015 03:26 PM, Stas Sergeev wrote: > 28.04.2015 15:58, Jacek Anaszewski пишет: >> On 04/28/2015 12:12 PM, Stas Sergeev wrote: >>> 28.04.2015 11:57, Jacek Anaszewski пишет: >>>> Hi Stas, >>>> >>>> Have you tested it? >>> Of course I did. >>> Works with gpio driver and provides up to 10usec precision on >>> armada-xp board. >>> This is 1000 times better than without my patch - the precision >>> was 10ms (jiffy). >> Please take into account that this could work reliably only for gpio >> LEDs. For the LEDs driven though a bus (e.g. I2C) delays below 1ms >> might be hard to achieve. The minimum available delay would vary from >> driver to driver. >> >> We could think of adding the hr_timer mode to the led-class. >> The mode could be turned on with use of a new led_set_high_res_timer >> API. The API would be called by drivers/leds/leds-gpio.c driver when >> a dedicated sysfs attribute was set adequately. >> The other drivers could also set this mode if they controlled device >> with a suitable LED switching rate. The minimum delay value could >> be made configurable by the driver and readable through sysfs >> when in hr_timer mode. > Why such a complexity? > Wouldn't it be enough if the driver can set the minimum delay > value, yet to always use the hrtimer? Hr timers would be advantageous only for leds-gpio AFAICS. There is no reason for making them default for all LED class drivers. I assume that they provide higher resolution at a cost of consuming more CPU/system resources. > Please note that 10ms (jiffy) is an inadequate minimum delay > pretty much for any driver, I guess. At least 1ms should be possible, > because, well, you can write 1ms to sysfs attribute even without > my patch. So even the existing options need hrtimer to work right. As I mentioned before even with hr timer it wouldn't be possible to assure that 1ms is achievable due to locking and bus latency reasons. >>>> I tried it with Samsung M0 board and >>>> my leds-aat1290 driver. It didn't work well. And for small delay >>>> intervals it will not have a chance to work reliably with all drivers, >>>> especially the ones which use mutex in their brightness_set op, >>>> since mutex can sleep. >>> OK, I can remove the nsec resolution. >> usec also didn't work, please look at my use case and warning: >> >> echo "timer" > trigger >> echo 1 > delay_on >> echo 1 > delay_off >> echo usec > delay_unit >> [ 178.584433] hrtimer: interrupt took 300747 ns > I think I should try a tasklet then. > >> Only some time later I realized that for AAT1290 brightness is set >> through ASCwire pulse protocol, which takes few ms. >> >> Please note that with this approach users would have to wonder why >> they are getting the warnings and why they can't get their LEDs to work >> with given settings. > OK, so we need a tasklet and the ability for the driver to set the > minimal delay. I think I can implement the former and hope someone > else will later implement the later. :) > Lets just solve the problem step-by-step. I can't solve all the > problems at once, but you can't deny the fact that the problem > exists and needs to be solved. > This seems not to be an urgent issue. Therefore it is better to provide complex solution in one patch set. -- Best Regards, Jacek Anaszewski -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/