Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933284AbbD2PPH (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Apr 2015 11:15:07 -0400 Received: from mailout3.w1.samsung.com ([210.118.77.13]:36000 "EHLO mailout3.w1.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933223AbbD2PPD (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Apr 2015 11:15:03 -0400 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed X-AuditID: cbfec7f4-f79c56d0000012ee-90-5540f57753f5 Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT Message-id: <5540F573.1040908@samsung.com> Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 17:14:59 +0200 From: Jacek Anaszewski User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130804 Thunderbird/17.0.8 To: Stas Sergeev Cc: linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, Linux kernel , Stas Sergeev Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] leds: blink resolution improvements References: <553E6CF5.4030601@list.ru> <553F4B60.20204@samsung.com> <553F5CFF.9090601@list.ru> <553F83DC.8080701@samsung.com> <5540BFFD.4090205@list.ru> In-reply-to: <5540BFFD.4090205@list.ru> X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFjrALMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVy+t/xK7rlXx1CDW6/U7W4vGsOm8XWN+sY LVo3NTBbdPZNY3Fg8bi35TKzR9OpdlaPz5vkApijuGxSUnMyy1KL9O0SuDJ6ljxlLZgsUjH9 6lvmBsb//F2MnBwSAiYS9/5sZISwxSQu3FvP1sXIxSEksJRR4vekk+wgCV4BQYkfk++xdDFy cDALyEscuZQNEmYWMJN41LKOGaL+GaPEnWm7WCDqtSSeLtjEBGKzCKhK3Jr8EyzOJmAo8fPF a7C4qECExJ/T+1hBZooAzdzQWAYxs0Li9+dTYPcIC9hLbN6/ghnEFhKYwyjxfpUOiM0poC5x 4eB0tgmMArOQXDcL4bpZSK5bwMi8ilE0tTS5oDgpPddQrzgxt7g0L10vOT93EyMkXL/sYFx8 zOoQowAHoxIPr4CuQ6gQa2JZcWXuIUYJDmYlEV7Gz0Ah3pTEyqrUovz4otKc1OJDjNIcLEri vHN3vQ8REkhPLEnNTk0tSC2CyTJxcEo1MG5uazTNkvf7G/ZRfGqyTFlGdJmZxurfx++9evRT 4ih/6d2QZW9mbth4/qvTKjGlB8c2/dQT1+GZdnvu1RMlvY96J67asjv9l5z4y1950X2NTjwb wt6cUr2vbrpP61FareTL9GOhHQZ+HE7BIqHaWwxqbghvKbpgqdbXuf7Q5ICgbqvaaVPkw5RY ijMSDbWYi4oTAQNpxipTAgAA Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2760 Lines: 69 On 04/29/2015 01:26 PM, Stas Sergeev wrote: > 28.04.2015 15:58, Jacek Anaszewski пишет: >> On 04/28/2015 12:12 PM, Stas Sergeev wrote: >>> 28.04.2015 11:57, Jacek Anaszewski пишет: >>>> Hi Stas, >>>> >>>> Have you tested it? >>> Of course I did. >>> Works with gpio driver and provides up to 10usec precision on >>> armada-xp board. >>> This is 1000 times better than without my patch - the precision >>> was 10ms (jiffy). >> >> Please take into account that this could work reliably only for gpio >> LEDs. For the LEDs driven though a bus (e.g. I2C) delays below 1ms >> might be hard to achieve. The minimum available delay would vary from >> driver to driver. >> >> We could think of adding the hr_timer mode to the led-class. >> The mode could be turned on with use of a new led_set_high_res_timer >> API. The API would be called by drivers/leds/leds-gpio.c driver when >> a dedicated sysfs attribute was set adequately. >> The other drivers could also set this mode if they controlled device >> with a suitable LED switching rate. The minimum delay value could >> be made configurable by the driver and readable through sysfs >> when in hr_timer mode. > I've found the SET_BRIGHTNESS_ASYNC and SET_BRIGHTNESS_SYNC flags. > Sounds interesting for my patch, but the only "documentation" I was > able to find, is this: > --- > /* Setting a torch brightness needs to have immediate effect */ > led_cdev->flags &= ~SET_BRIGHTNESS_ASYNC; > led_cdev->flags |= SET_BRIGHTNESS_SYNC; > --- > Aren't these flags mutually exclusive, and so just one could have > been used? Yes they are. > Anyway, from that comment I can try to guess that if the driver > supports ASYNC mode, it should be fast enough and without sleeps. > The drivers that do i2c transfers with sleeps, should be using SYNC > mode. Or was the intention for these flags entirely different? Sync mode was designed for flash LED devices, for which turning torch immediately has a big importance because they are often synchronized with camera sensor. Triggers use led_set_brightness_async API anyway. > My intention is to use either a work-queue or a direct hrtimer > callback, depending on whether the driver supports sync or async > mode. This is instead of the driver being able to set the minimum > delay - much simpler to implement. Makes sense? > Can I use the above flags for that purpose, or will I need > a new one? > These flags are intended for internal LED core use. -- Best Regards, Jacek Anaszewski -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/