Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 14 Jan 2003 16:42:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 14 Jan 2003 16:42:22 -0500 Received: from mailgate.bridgetrading.com ([62.49.201.178]:38870 "EHLO directcommunications.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 14 Jan 2003 16:42:21 -0500 Message-ID: <3E24864B.4060905@Funderburg.com> Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 21:51:07 +0000 From: Chris Funderburg Organization: DCI (Europe) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-GB; rv:1.3a) Gecko/20021212 X-Accept-Language: en-gb, en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Mielke CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Richard Stallman Subject: Re: [OFFTOPIC] RMS and reactions to him References: <20030114190600.GC19154@work.bitmover.com> <20030114200202.GG19154@work.bitmover.com> <20030114151938.A30371@kerberos.ncsl.nist.gov> <20030114210845.GE15412@mark.mielke.cc> In-Reply-To: <20030114210845.GE15412@mark.mielke.cc> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.71.3.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Mark Mielke wrote: > In actual fact, I don't want RMS to stop. Well, he "hasn't stopped" in years: ************************************************************************ Date: Thu, 7 Mar 1996 10:49:16 -0600 (CST) Reply-To: lilo To: Richard Stallman cc: alan@cymru.net, ganderson@clark.net, linux-misc@vger.rutgers.edu, linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu Subject: Re: Linux isn't an operating system Sender: owner-linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu Precedence: bulk isn't there an advocacy newsgroup for gnu software? this is pretty clearly off-topic. speaking from my own experience, it's very easy to get caught up in an advocacy thread, even when that thread is clearly off-topic. :) i also suspect that it will continue to generate flames as long as the originator keeps pursuing it here. ;) lilo On Wed, 6 Mar 1996, Richard Stallman wrote: > I think I should explain the difference between "GNU software" and > "the GNU operating system". It would be inaccurate to say that a > system such Slackware consists mainly of GNU software, but correct I > believe to say it is mostly the same as the GNU system. > > I started the GNU project in 1984 with the aim of making a complete > free Unix-like operating system. I wrote some parts myself--GCC, > Emacs, GDB, and other smaller ones. Other people wrote other > components for the GNU project. These programs are GNU software. > > We also added to the GNU system some programs like X Windows and parts > of BSD which were written by other projects. These programs are not > GNU software, but they are parts of the GNU system (and parts of other > systems as well). When Linux was written, the GNU system was almost > complete, but lacking a kernel. Putting the incomplete GNU system > together with Linux realized my dream of a free operating system. > > In principle, there's no reason why a system based on Linux has to be > a variant GNU system, and perhaps some of them are not. But as far as > I know, most of them currently are. > > To speak of "Linux Based MIT X Windows/GNU/BSD/MIT systems" would be > correct. But people may find it impractical. The term "Linux-based > GNU system" is also correct, and it is practical. > > By using this term, we can help encourage people to work together > instead of dividing themselves artificially into "Linux users" and > "GNU users". This solves an important practical problem. > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/