Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751286AbbD2U5M (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Apr 2015 16:57:12 -0400 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:51031 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750749AbbD2U5K (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Apr 2015 16:57:10 -0400 Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 16:57:06 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <20150429.165706.2224795686499859484.davem@davemloft.net> To: vpai@akamai.com Cc: razor@blackwall.org, andy@greyhouse.net, j.vosburgh@gmail.com, vfalico@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix Kernel Panic in bonding driver debugfs file: rlb_hash_table From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <55413F74.3010204@akamai.com> References: <554134D1.7070509@blackwall.org> <55413F74.3010204@akamai.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.6 on Emacs 24.4 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.12 (shards.monkeyblade.net [149.20.54.216]); Wed, 29 Apr 2015 13:57:10 -0700 (PDT) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 544 Lines: 13 From: Vishwanath Pai Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 16:30:44 -0400 > Since the patch has been applied already - should I send a V2 with the > suggested changes? Or submit a new patch that applies on top of the > first patch? You should always send me a relative patch in this situation. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/